1976 Toyota Landcruiser Fj40 on 2040-cars
Du Bois, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2F
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Toyota
Model: Land Cruiser
Trim: FJ40
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Convertible
Drive Type: 4x4
Mileage: 87,912
Exterior Color: Mustard Yellow
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
For Auction
This is an AWESOME 1976 Toyota Landcruiser FJ40. It was professionally restored about 10+ years ago and is in GREAT shape. After that is was driven only on sunny days. I purchased it
in Tennessee. It does not have any power options. It is a 4 speed. It does have a winch and a controller, but I have not used them. I have the original invoice and manuals for the vehicle as well as a box of extra parts.
Note I have included pictures of a small area of rust on bed by the garage doors. 1"x1". It does drip a drop or 2 of oil from the oil pan. I have also purchased a new tub seal, seal above the windshield, power steering kit.
The buyer is responsible for all taxes and pick-up. I will require a $2000 down payment within 3 days of auction close.
Toyota Land Cruiser for Sale
- 2013 toyota land cruiser, navigation, dvd, leather, remote start, jbl, sunroof
- Fj40 land cruiser 2f engine 4wd(US $26,900.00)
- 1984 toyota land crusier(US $1,500.00)
- No reserve land cruiser 4x4 awd 4wd low miles clean garaged loaded up bid to win
- 1995 toyota land cruiser supercharged with 4x4 and 3 rows of seats no reserve
- 1983 toyota land cruiser base sport utility fj cruiser diesel!(US $33,990.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
YBJ Auto Sales ★★★★★
West View Auto Body ★★★★★
Wengert`s Automotive ★★★★★
University Collision Center ★★★★★
Ultimate Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Stewart Collision Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Toyota unveils two new small displacement engines
Thu, 10 Apr 2014Toyota introduced a pair of brand-new engines in Japan today, that it says will eventually spawn 14 different variants by 2015. Where these two engines stand out in today's world, is that neither mill boasts direct injection, and both are naturally aspirated.
The larger of the two is a 1.3-liter, while the smaller engine, a 1.0-liter, was developed in collaboration with Daihatsu. What makes these two unique is that they both use the Atkinson cycle. Now, we aren't going to bore you by explaining just what this is - there's Google for that. Suffice it to say, Atkinson engines are highly efficient, but that efficiency comes by sacrificing power. That's why they're so popular in hybrids, which can offset the power losses.
This focus on fuel efficiency extends throughout the new engines, which also benefit from tweaks like a cooled exhaust gas recirculation system and a trick intake port, while the 1.3 employs Toyota's iE variant of variable valve timing. Both engines can be fitted with stop-start tech. According to Toyota, when fitted with stop-start the 1.3 should provide around a 15-percent bump while the 1.0-liter will increase economy around 30 percent, when they arrive on the road.
Toyota recalls 209,000 FJ Cruisers over seatbelt issue
Sat, 16 Mar 2013Toyota has announced that it will be issuing a substantial recall of the FJ Cruiser for a problem that could cause the front seatbelt retractors to separate from the vehicle body. This recall will apply to all FJ Cruisers - from 2007 through 2013 - totaling around 209,000 units.
The problem stems from the FJ Cruiser's pillarless door opening design that has the front-occupant seatbelts attached to the rear doors. Toyota says that when the rear doors are "repeatedly and forcefully closed," the retractor could completely separate from the door frame.
While there is no information about this recall from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration yet, Toyota says that there have been no accidents or injuries associated with this issue. No specific fix or recall date are given, but the official press release is posted below.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.