2010 Saab 93x Sport Combi Wagon Only 20k Miles Like New on 2040-cars
Loganville, Georgia, United States
Body Type:Wagon
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:ENGINE, 2.0L DOHC MPFI 4-CYLINDER, TURBOCHARGED
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Saab
Model: 9-3
Mileage: 20,873
Sub Model: 9-3X
Transmission Description: TRANSMISSION, AUTOMATIC, SENTRONIC
Exterior Color: Gray
Number of Doors: 4
Interior Color: Tan
Drivetrain: All Wheel Drive
Number of Cylinders: 4
Saab 9-3 for Sale
- 2001 saab 9-3 se convertible 77k auto turbo 4cyl pa-r-title(US $3,500.00)
- No reserve! only 59k miles! clean carfax! leather! onstar! sports cpe 2dr fwd
- 2001 saab 9 3 viggen convertible(US $2,000.00)
- We finance 2008 saab 9-3 2.0t auto cleancarfax mroof bluetooth lthrhtdsts wrrnty(US $10,000.00)
- Rare 2008 saab 9-3 turbo x awd 6cyl turbo 1 owner car(US $19,495.00)
- 2004 one owner california saab 9-3 linear sedan 4-door 2.0lturbo(US $6,900.00)
Auto Services in Georgia
Valdosta Toyota Scion ★★★★★
US Auto Sales ★★★★★
Turns Inc ★★★★★
Troy`s Complete Car Care ★★★★★
Tint Guy ★★★★★
The Jw Auto Group ★★★★★
Auto blog
Spyker to appeal dismissal of Saab lawsuit against GM
Fri, 21 Jun 2013It seems as if Spyker CEO Victor Muller has made a decision on whether or not to pursue a legal battle between his company and General Motors. Spyker has announced it will appeal a US District Court decision to throw out the company's lawsuit against GM. As you may recall, on June 10 Judge Gershwin Drain ruled tht GM had a right to approve or disapprove Spyker's sale of Saab to Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile. Spyker sued GM for some $3 billion, claiming that the American automaker had forced Saab into bankruptcy by stopping Spyker from transferring intellectual property to its Chinese partner.
Spyker has said only that it plans to appeal the decision. Until now, the company has been silent about the ruling. GM, meanwhile, has said it is pleased with the original outcome. You can read the quick Spyker press release below for more information.
Spyker's $3B lawsuit against GM for blocking Saab sale thrown out
Tue, 11 Jun 2013US District Judge Gershwin Drain has dismissed a $3-billion lawsuit Spyker filed against General Motors. In the suit, Spyker accused GM of attempting to bankrupt Saab after the US automaker had already sold the company to Spyker. GM in effect blocked the sale of Saab to China's Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile Company by prohibiting the transfer of some of its intellectual property. But the court found that GM had a "contractual right" to approve or disapprove any change of ownership. Furthermore, Reuters reports Judge Drain said the contract between GM and Spyker "is clear, unambiguous and absolute" on the matter.
GM, meanwhile, says it is pleased with the ruling. Spyker CEO Victor Muller has not said whether or not his company will appeal the ruling. The Dutch automaker is expected to make a final decision once the court issues its written order on the case.
You can read the official Spyker press release about the court ruling below for more information.
Spyker files $3 billion lawsuit against General Motors over Saab's demise
Mon, 06 Aug 2012"Smack." That's the sound of Spyker's process server dropping a big ol' pile of legal documents on the doorstep of The Renaissance Center, home of General Motors - or wherever GM's attorneys live during business hours. Contained therein is a Complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and demanding a jury trial, that seeks $3 billion in damages due to "the unlawful actions GM took to avoid competition with Saab Automobile in the Chinese market." Spyker accuses GM of "tortiously interfering" with Saab's business relationship with Chinese automaker Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile (Youngman), actions that Spyker CEO Victor Muller (above) said "deliberately drove Saab Automobile into bankruptcy."
(From Wikipedia: "Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when a person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships.")
The interference in question specifically refers to the very last potential deal, called the Framework Agreement, that Spyker worked out with Youngman. With lots of GM engineering embedded into the 9-4X and 9-5, The General had the right to approve any Saab partnership that would involve the transfer of GM intellectual property. Spyker had been rebuffed over every previous deal with a Chinese firm, including two bids by Youngman, due to GM concerns over its IP getting into Chinese hands and having to face Chinese-market competitors using its technology. The Complaint alleges that the Framework Agreement would have put a firewall around all GM IP - Youngman would only work on Saab's Phoenix platform, said to be just about free of GM tech, and would have no access to 9-3, 9-4X or 9-5 technology until after Saab ceased all ties to GM.