Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Jeep Grand Wagoneer on 2040-cars

Year:1989 Mileage:116815
Location:

McFall, Missouri, United States

McFall, Missouri, United States

 I drive this jeep almost everyday to feed horses, fishing, hunting and im not ever worried that it wont get me home. having said that the motor is weak, I think its a carb problem but im no mechanic. if it sits for more than a week or so without being started it takes awhile to get gas pumped up to carb so I know theres a problem there. but it always starts. it has some lifter noise at idle but seems to clear up off idle. 4wd drive works as it should. A/C does NOT work ive never tried to charge it as I don't ever drive it to far. it needs tires I have 1 like new tire that will go with it if you want. Im not sure wether the cruise works or not, not sure ive ever tried to use it.  both frnt  pwr windows work, slowly, but they work. rear gate window switch is not wired properly. it took me 6months to figure out 2 wires by battery raise and lower rear window. so the window itself works flawlessly. rtrear pass window works so slowly its scary to use it so I don't  ltrear pass window doesn't work, I don't know if its wiring or motor or what..i never cared. im trying to think if im missing something important?? if I am please ask I will answer best and honest as I can. need more pics?? ask and I will try my best...im not very computer or digital camera savvy, but I will make an effort.....maybe I should mention...previous owner painted this jeep im not sure of orig color. they did a decent job on the paint and a fair at best job on the masking...from 5 or 10 ft away it looks real nice but you get closer you can see some minor flaws.. roof paint goes without saying is beginning to peel see photo. almost forgot the battery is newer..less than 3 mo old

 I originally bought it for my son... he had to have it...he has since moved on and I just don't have a big need to pay for insurance and plates and taxes on a toy.  its a 25 y/o vehicle and it has flaws but IMO a lot fewer flaws than most its age winning bidder or anyone is welcome and encouraged to come check it out anytime during the auction and if youre the winner and you come to pick it up and don't like what you see then walk away no hard feelings

as I said I drive this almost every day so mileage will be slightly higher... I would be shocked if it got to 117,000 before auction end.. I maybe drive it  3 miles a day   maybe 12 or 15 if it needs gas

Auto Services in Missouri

Wodohodsky Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 24300 County Road 9020, Dixon
Phone: (573) 759-6250

West County Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 14747 Manchester Road, Saint-Ann
Phone: (636) 394-0330

Wayne`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9902 S Broadway, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (314) 544-4141

Superior Collision Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1008 N Robin St, Nixa
Phone: (417) 724-0707

Superior Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 620 W Main St, Smithton
Phone: (660) 826-0578

Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1548 N Glenstone Ave, Branson-West
Phone: (417) 831-5960

Auto blog

Chrysler recalling 644k more Dodge Durango and Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs over brakes

Wed, 02 Apr 2014

Early last month, we reported on Chrysler issuing a preemptive, proactive recall for about 25,000 units of the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango. The issue revolved around a brake system that wasn't causing any actual problems, but delivered an unsatisfactory brake feel, so Auburn Hills called in a good 25,000 of SUVs around the world, including 18,700 in the United States.
Now Chrysler, having apparently determined that the brake problem on its sport utes is actually much bigger than it initially realized, has drastically broadened the scope of the recall. As a result, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued a recall for precisely 655,354 examples of the Grand Cherokee and Durango, covering the 2011 through 2014 model years. In addition, Chrysler is recalling 42,380 units in Canada, 21,376 in Mexico and 159,685 overseas.
The problem which Chrysler found revolves around the brake booster, whose center shell has been found to be subject to corrosion, allowing water to get into the brake system. That water in turn could freeze, preventing the brakes from working as well as expected.

Six 'shut up and take my money' cars

Tue, 11 Nov 2014

Any time you see this iconic moment in pop culture - Shut up and take my money! - posted in response to a new car reveal, rumor for an upcoming model or even lip-service to a vehicle that should exist, you can bet there's some intrinsic good in the idea. Though depending on the person offering up the cash, that good could take the form of extraordinary form, functionality, weight savings, power, handling, etc. You get the idea.
In fact, when I first proposed this list, I reached out to the Autoblog staff to help me brainstorm. Here are some of the ideas they offered up that I ultimately didn't use: Jaguar XE Coupe, Pagani Huayra Roadster, Mercedes-Benz S-Class "parade car" (cabriolet), Morgan 3-Wheeler with Ducati V-twin, Ford Transit Connectamino (pickup), Mercedes CLA63 AMG, Ford Fusion 5.0, BMW i8 Spyder, Lexus RC-F Shooting Brake, Volvo XC90 Polestar. Oh, and things we collectively wanted to stick Dodge's Hellcat in were almost as numerous as models that Fiat Chrysler Automotive currently makes (though none quite so compelling as the Grand Cherokee you see above.)
Ultimately though, while I used a couple of ideas from my colleagues, the list of cars I'd shell out for unquestionably is very personal. Though it isn't complete, what follows is a selection of cars whose very existence would prompt me - or the trust-fund-baby versions of me - to utter without hesitation: "Shut up and take my money."

7 months later, Jeep 'trailer hitch' recall still stalled

Tue, 14 Jan 2014

For the past few years, Chrysler and its CEO, Sergio Marchionne, have gone head-to-head with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and its boss, David Strickland, over the government safety agency's request for Chrysler to recall almost three-million Jeep vehicles due to what NHTSA says is a safety issue that has caused at least 51 deaths. After a three-year investigation and Chrysler's initial refusal to issue a recall because it deemed the vehicles safe and built to the day's federal requirements, last summer, the two parties compromised on a "voluntary campaign" to inspect 1.56 million vehicles, those being the 1992 to 1998 Grand Cherokee and 2002 to 2007 Liberty.
Those vehicles were designed with their gas tanks between the rear axle and the bumper, and NHTSA says that in rear-end collisions, damage to the fuel tank has caused fires responsible for those 51 deaths. The compromise reached last summer was that Chrysler would inspect 1.56 million vehicles and, "if necessary, provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle." Practically speaking, that meant Chrysler would replace aftermarket trailer hitches, but would take no action if a vehicle had a factory-installed hitch or an aftermarket hitch from Mopar.
A report in The Detroit News says the "voluntary campaign" is just now getting under way, with Chrysler saying last week that the design of the replacement part had been finalized and it was tooling up "to deliver the required volume." Seven months later, still in question is whether NHTSA will crash-test the fix engineered by Chrysler, noteworthy because not only did the vehicles in question pass every safety standard necessary to be cleared for sale at the time, there are still questions (to those of us on the outside) as to how the Jeeps at issue fare among their peers in such incidents. Either way, Chrysler and NHTSA apparently still disagree on the efficacy of the remedy itself: the carmaker says it might help in low-speed crashes but not high-speed collisions, a position the NHTSA is at odds with. All of this means the campaign doesn't yet have an end in sight.