2008 Grey Auto Heated Leather Nav Sunroof!! Call Us Today!!!! Beautiful Car!! on 2040-cars
Kellogg, Idaho, United States
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:5.7L 345Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sedan
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Other
Make: Dodge
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Charger
Trim: R/T Sedan 4-Door
Disability Equipped: No
Drive Type: RWD
Doors: 4
Mileage: 51,730
Drive Train: Rear Wheel Drive
Sub Model: R/T
Number of Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Other
Number of Cylinders: 8
Dodge Charger for Sale
- 1969 dodge charger 500 restomod, one of one
- 5.7l hemi navigation back up sunroof beats audio adapt cruise $8000 off msrp(US $30,980.00)
- 1974 dodge charger special edition hardtop 2-door 5.9l
- 1970 dodge charger 500 5.2l
- 5.7l hemi v8 navigation sunroof leather heated seats back up cam $8500 off msrp!(US $30,380.00)
- 1973 dodge charger
Auto Services in Idaho
Nampa Auto Repair & Towing ★★★★★
Mountain Home Car Care Center ★★★★★
Major Tire & Hitch Inc ★★★★★
Lund Service ★★★★★
John`s Powertune, Inc. ★★★★★
Custom Car Design Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel
Mon, 10 Mar 2014Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.
Dodge Dart falls short of Consumer Reports Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too
Thu, 22 Nov 2012The Dodge Dart, Cadillac XTS and Lincoln MKS all failed to earn a "Recommended" rating from Consumer Reports. When it came to the compact Dart, the organization's testers thought the vehicle offered a quiet cabin, solid-feeling chassis and nimble suspension, but the new model ultimately fell short of the coveted rating due to powertrain issues. The institute's reviewers found the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine to be underpowered and noted "drivability issues" when the available turbocharged 1.4-liter four was paired with the optional dual-clutch transmission (some of our editors disliked it paired with the six-speed manual). CR also dinged the latter powerplant for sounding "raspy." For what it's worth, we think the forced-induction engine offers an excellent and playful exhaust note, but that's just us.
As for the XTS, CR lauded the car for its luxurious cabin, but the vehicle's experience was dulled by its finicky CUE infotainment interface. Overall, the big Cadillac scored much higher than its cross-town rival from Lincoln. While testers found the American luxury sedan to offer a quiet ride and quality fit and finish, they felt the MKS delivered a "cramped driving position, ungainly handling, uncomposed ride, and limited visibility." Ouch. At the end of the day, both cars fell short of rivals from Japan, Germany and Korea. Check out the full press release below with more details, along with CR's musings on the Chevrolet Spark and Lexus ES.
Has Dodge stepped in it again with Scat Pack lawsuit?
Mon, 20 Oct 2014Lawsuits are an unfortunate part of doing business in just about any industry, so the latest complaint filed by a California-based aftermarket firm against Chrysler would seem to be nothing more than business as usual. But this isn't the first time the two companies have sparred over this particular issue.
According to a report from Automotive News, the dispute revolves around the Scat Pack name that Chrysler first offered on the Charger, Coronet, Dart and Super Bee starting in 1968. Scat Enterprises, a manufacturer of crankshafts and other components for Dodges and other vehicles, sued Chrysler for using its name. A few years later the Scat Pack disappeared from the Dodge catalog.
Fast forward to August 2013 when Chrysler applied to register the Scat Pack name anew. The US Patent and Trademark Office turned down Chrysler's application, but the automaker proceeded anyway, unveiling new Scat Packs for the Challenger, Charger and Dart at last year's SEMA show.