2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Lt on 2040-cars
9700 Dorchester Road, Summerville, South Carolina, United States
Engine:5.3L V8 16V GDI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3GCPCRECXEG151055
Stock Num: P4452
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500 LT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Jet Black
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 19663
!!TO VALIDATE THIS ADVERTISED PRICE SAVINGS, PRINT THIS PAGE AND ASK FOR BRIAN SMITH OR SAL RIGOROSO!! #866-485-0311
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
- 2013 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $22,960.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $28,550.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $29,785.00)
- 2010 chevrolet silverado 1500 lt(US $30,222.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $31,090.00)
- 2013 chevrolet silverado 1500 ltz(US $34,584.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wilson Collision Center ★★★★★
W W Kustomz Auto Sales ★★★★★
Summit Collision Centers ★★★★★
Starnes Automotive Tire ★★★★★
Southern Motor Company ★★★★★
Southern Film Installations ★★★★★
Auto blog
Watch how Corvette Racing's new collision-avoidance radar system works
Fri, 22 Mar 2013When it comes to technology used in racecars, we generally expect it to trickle down to production cars, not the other way around. Well, Pratt & Miller has developed a new rear-facing radar that operates in a similar fashion to what we're used to in modern blind spot detection systems, only it is also capable of tracking cars as they approach and relaying vital information to the driver via a large display screen.
The innovative radar system debuted at last weekend's 12 Hours of Sebring for Corvette Racing, and this system makes perfect sense for endurance races like this since the cars sometimes have to drive through the night and in poor weather conditions.
The radar can detect cars even with poor visibility, and uses easy-to-distinguish symbols for the driver to identify.
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.